<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>theaimsjournal</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Allana Management Journal of Research, Pune</JournalTitle>
      <PISSN>&nbsp;2581 - 3137 (</PISSN>
      <EISSN>)  2231 -&nbsp; 0290 (Print)</EISSN>
      <Volume-Issue>Volume 15, Issue 1 </Volume-Issue>
      <PartNumber/>
      <IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
      <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
      <Season>January 2025 – June 2025</Season>
      <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
      <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
      <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
      <PubDate>
        <Year>-0001</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <ArticleType>General Management</ArticleType>
      <ArticleTitle>A STUDY OF FUTURE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN RESEARCH</ArticleTitle>
      <SubTitle/>
      <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
      <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
      <FirstPage>16</FirstPage>
      <LastPage>26</LastPage>
      <AuthorList>
        <Author>
          <FirstName/>
          <LastName>Shaikh</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
        </Author>
      </AuthorList>
      <DOI>https://doi.org/10.62223/AMJR.2025.150102 </DOI>
      <Abstract>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in scientific research, transforming data analysis, automation, and decision-making. As its presence expands, AI is also intersecting with research ethics, prompting critical reflections on accountability, transparency, and fairness.&#13;
&#13;
			Purpose: This study investigates the emerging role of AI in ethical decision-making within scientific research. It aims to explore how AI-driven tools can assist researchers, institutions, and policymakers in upholding ethical standards amidst growing research complexity.&#13;
&#13;
			Design/Methodology/Approach: The paper adopts a conceptual and analytical approach, reviewing current and emerging AI technologies—such as ethical review systems, decision-support frameworks, and predictive models. It draws from literature and illustrative case discussions to assess ethical applications and challenges.&#13;
&#13;
			Findings: AI shows promise in enhancing ethical governance by increasing consistency, transparency, and efficiency. However, concerns around algorithmic bias, interpretability, and accountability persist. The study advocates for a balanced AI-human collaboration to ensure responsible and adaptable ethical decision-making.&#13;
&#13;
			Research Limitations/Implications: This is a conceptual study without empirical validation. Future research should evaluate AI-based ethical tools in real-world settings to understand their effectiveness and ethical soundness across diverse disciplines.&#13;
&#13;
			Practical Implications: AI can support ethical review processes, assist decision-makers, and encourage proactive compliance. Such tools offer scalable solutions for managing ethics in complex or high-volume research environments.&#13;
&#13;
			Originality/Value: The paper presents a novel perspective on integrating AI into research ethics. It highlights AI’s dual potential—as a tool for ethical enhancement and a source of new ethical risks—calling for transparent, accountable, and human-centered frameworks</Abstract>
      <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
      <Keywords>AI-Driven, Automation, Accountability   Research Ethics  Transparency</Keywords>
      <URLs>
        <Abstract>https://www.theaimsjournal.org/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=15863&amp;title=A STUDY OF FUTURE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING IN RESEARCH</Abstract>
      </URLs>
      <References>
        <ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
        <ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
        <ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
        <References>Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., Bankins, S. (2021). The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: A decision-making framework. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(4), 841–854.&#13;
	Bauer, G. R., and; Lizotte, D. J. (2021). Artificial intelligence, intersectionality, and the future of public health. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 98–100.&#13;
	Bond, R. R., Mulvenna, M. D., Wan, H., Finlay, D. D., Wong, A., Koene, A., ... and; Adel, T. (2019, October). Human centered artificial intelligence: Weaving UX into algorithmic decision making. In RoCHI (pp. 2–9).&#13;
	Dand;iacute;az-Domand;iacute;nguez, A. (2020). How futures studies and foresight could address ethical dilemmas of machine learning and artificial intelligence. World Futures Review, 12(2), 169–180.&#13;
	Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., and; Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71.&#13;
	Guan, H., Dong, L., and; Zhao, A. (2022). Ethical risk factors and mechanisms in artificial intelligence decision making. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9), 343.&#13;
	Hicham, N., Nassera, H., and; Karim, S. (2023). Strategic framework for leveraging artificial intelligence in future marketing decision-making. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2(3), 139–150.&#13;
	Luxton, D. D. (2014). Artificial intelligence in psychological practice: Current and future applications and implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(5), 332.&#13;
	MacIntyre, M. R., Cockerill, R. G., Mirza, O. F., and; Appel, J. M. (2023). Ethical considerations for the use of artificial intelligence in medical decision-making capacity assessments. Psychiatry Research, 328, 115466.&#13;
	Mehr, H., Ash, H., and; Fellow, D. (2017). Artificial intelligence for citizen services and government. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School.&#13;
	Miller, G. J. (2021, September). Artificial intelligence project success factors: Moral decision-making with algorithms. In 2021 16th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS) (pp. 379–390). IEEE.&#13;
	Shafik, W. (2024). Toward a more ethical future of artificial intelligence and data science. In The Ethical Frontier of AI and Data Analysis (pp. 362–388). IGI Global.&#13;
	Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., and; Von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83.&#13;
	Sunarti, S., Rahman, F. F., Naufal, M., Risky, M., Febriyanto, K., and; Masnina, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Opportunities and risk for future. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35, S67–S70.&#13;
	Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., and; Xu, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence and moral dilemmas: Perception of ethical decision-making in AI. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101, 104327.</References>
      </References>
    </Journal>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>